I'm just heading off to the DRUID conference in Barcelona.
The surprising and it seems little known fact is that Charities in about a third of OECD countries spend more on research in universities than the business sector. Astonishing but true.
More astonishing is the lack of recognition for the data rather than the rhetoric of the triple helix.
The paper's Abstract
We have become familiar and comfortable with the idea that the science, technology and innovation (STI) system of countries is constructed around the so called ?triple helix? of government, universities and business. Contrary to the academic interest and government policy, the public is increasingly bypassing this club to impact science funding and innovation outcomes through directly creating and donating funds for research that they want. The charities and foundations coordinating this shift are neither ignorant of strategy or dealing in petty cash. In a significant number of OECD countries, private-non-profits as the statistical category is called, fund the higher education research system at a similar or greater level than business. This result has important implications for how we understand the STI system. This paper explores this gap in the literature, ambiguities in analyzing the phenomenon and suggests a framework for further analysis how charities and foundations are reconfiguring STI systems.
You can get a copy of the paper here.
http://druid8.sit.aau.dk/acc_papers/2p2kleih0x11v4r4fqsoj7r1phj6.pdf
In the current fast paced innovation environment, companies are pushing the boundaries of existing legal frameworks. This blogs tracks the what's happening. This blog started with the idea of being an analysis of relevant topics. However, that task is too big an events too fast so it has morphed into an attempt to track the issues, to map the emerging needs of policy. Thus, it is a kind of log book of policy issues that pass my desk.